Ecological Archives E086-026-A1

Evan L. Preisser, Daniel I. Bolnick, and Michael F. Benard. 2005. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509.

Appendix A. A summary of data gathered from papers used in this meta-analysis.

For each study, we provide a reference (see Appendix B for full citations), a list of the taxa involved, a brief summary of the trait-mediated interaction (TMI), details about the study system (ecosystem, food chain length, TMI mechanism, and whether or not TMI and density-mediated interaction (DMI) effects were in opposite directions), and experimental methods (experimental scale, experimental duration, what effects were reported in the original reference, and what variable was measured). We provide the magnitude of trait-mediated effects relative to total predator effects (the response ratio), the log response ratio used for statistical analysis, and the variance of the log response ratio. The number of experimental treatment replicates, and the number of individuals within each treatment replicate (where available) are provided separately. Finally, we document the source of our data from the relevant reference.

TABLE A1. A summary of studies used for meta-analysis of trait-mediated effect sizes.

Reference no.
Reference
Primary predator
Secondary predator§
Prey
Resource
TMI description
Ecosystem
Scale
Duration (days)
Food chain length
Mechanism of TMI
Measured effects
Opposing TMI and DMI?
Measured variable
Relative TMI effect (RR)
ln(abs(RR)+1)
Variance
Number of replicates
Individuals per replicate
Data source
1 Beckerman et al. (1997) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum,
red-legged grasshopper
  Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in the presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grasshopper density 0.6667 0.5108 1.1285 20 8 Table 1
2 Blaustein (1997) Salamandra infraimmaculata,
fire salamander
  Arctodiaptomus similis, calanoid copepod   Cues from predatory salamanders cause crustaceans to delay hatching. freshwater lab 50 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no Crustacean density 1.0000 0.6931 0.0022 5 n/a Fig. 1
2 Blaustein (1997)     Ceriodaphnia quadrangula, cladocera   Cues from predatory salamanders cause crustaceans to delay hatching. freshwater lab 50 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no Crustacean density 0.9885 0.6874 0.1144 5 n/a Fig. 2
2 Blaustein (1997) Salamandra infraimmaculata,
fire salamander
  Cyzicus sp., clam shrimp   Cues from predatory salamanders cause crustaceans to delay hatching. freshwater lab 50 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no Crustacean density 0.9325 0.6588 0.0060 5 n/a Fig. 1
3 Brodin and Johansson (2002) Perca fluviatilis,
perch
  Lestes sponsa,
damselfly
  Perch reduce damselfly foraging behavior; non-lethal perch do not. freshwater field 150 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no number of prey emerging as adults 0.0237 0.0234 2.8142 6, 12 33 Text, p. 319
3 Brodin and Johansson (2002) Perca fluviatilis,
perch
  Lestes sponsa,
damselfly
Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
Perch reduce damselfly foraging behavior; non-lethal perch do not. freshwater field 150 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes zooplankton density 0.0243 0.0240 12.8879 6 n/a Fig. 1
4 Crowder et al. (1997) wading birds Paralichthys lethostigma,
southern flounder
Leiostomus xanthurus,
spot
  Predatory birds cause spot to aggregate making them harder for flounder to catch. marine field 15 two-level predator inhibition DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality of spot 0.9636 0.6748 0.0003 4 395 Table 2
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Baetis rhodani,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0001 0.0001 2500.0016 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Leuctra sp.,
stonefly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0015 0.0015 2500.2402 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Pacifastacus leniusculus,
signal crayfish
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0001 0.0001 2500.0509 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Limnephilidae, caddisfly   Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0006 0.0006 2500.0204 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Cottus gobio,
bullhead
  Gammarus pulex,
isopod
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.5957 0.4673 0.0148 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
5 Dahl (1998) Salmo trutta,
brown trout
  Baetis rhodani,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 31 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.0010 0.0010 2500.0297 4 n/a Text, pg. 429
6 Diehl et al. (2000) Salmo trutta,
brown trout
  Baetis bicaudatus,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 66 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no emigration and mortality rates 0.3000 0.2624 0.5883 6 n/a Fig. 4
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Culiseta longiareolata,
mosquito
  Mosquitoes avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 11 two-level emigration TMI, Total no number of larvae and pupae surviving 0.4599 0.3783 0.0004 6 45 Fig. 1
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Culiseta laticinctus,
mosquito
  Mosquitoes avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 11 two-level emigration TMI, Total no number of larvae and pupae surviving 0.4925 0.4004 0.0383 6 30 Fig. 2
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Forcipomyia sp.,
fly
  Flies avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number of pupae surviving 3.5610 1.5175 0.6039 6 n/a Fig. 3
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Chironomus riparius,
midge
  Midges avoid ovipositing in presence of predator. freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number of pupal exuviae 1.0428 0.7143 0.1038 6 n/a Fig. 4
7 Eitam et al. (2002) Anisops sardea,
backswimmer
  Daphnia sp.   Daphnia eggs enter diapause in presence of predator freshwater field 22 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no daphnia density 0.7210 0.5429 0.0202 6 n/a Fig. 5
8 Eklöv and Van Kooten (2001) Esox lucius,
pike
Perca fluviatilis,
perch
Rutilus rutilus,
roach
  Increased mortality of roach caused by perch facilitation of pike. freshwater field 130 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no roach mortality 0.2055 0.1869 0.0117 5 80 Fig. 1A
9 Eklöv and Werner (2000) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 1 (smallest)   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.2509 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 1 (smallest)   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.0267 0.0263 0.1034 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 2   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0005 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 2   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 50000.0000 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 3   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0055 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 3   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 4   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0009 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 4   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 5   Bluegill consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0205 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana catesbeiana, bullfrog; size 5   Anax consume bullfrogs. Nonlethal bluegill cues cause bullfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 1 (smallest)   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.4800 0.3920 0.0838 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 1 (smallest)   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 8 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.6014 0.4708 0.0063 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 2   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 1.5063 0.9188 0.0096 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 2   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.1103 0.1047 0.0165 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 3   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 4.2000 1.6487 0.3096 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 3   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.2362 0.2120 0.0569 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 4   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.2439 0.2183 0.2031 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 4   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 0.2442 0.2185 0.0420 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 5   Anax consume greenfrogs Nonlethal bluegill cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 4 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes number of prey consumed 1.0000 0.6931 0.0056 4 10 Fig. 1
10 Eklöv and Werner (2001) Anax sp., dragonfly   Rana clamitans, green frog, size 5   Bluegill consume greenfrogs. Nonlethal Anax cues cause greenfrogs to alter behavior, which may influence their survival, depending on size class freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of prey consumed 0.0000 0.0000 0.0160 4 10 Fig. 1
11 Feltmate and Williams (1989) Oncorhynchus mykiss,
rainbow trout
  Paragnetina media,
stonefly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 4 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no stonefly density 0.5746 0.4540 0.0725 3 n/a Fig. 2
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 28 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes amphipod density 2.3931 1.2217 12.1040 4 n/a Fig. 6A
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 28 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes amphipod density 0.5947 0.4667 90.2204 4 n/a Fig. 6B
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine lab 6 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod mortality 0.7863 0.5802 0.0006 9 200 Fig. 4
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Crangon crangon,
shrimp
  Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine lab 6 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod mortality 0.8883 0.6357 0.0019 9 200 Fig. 4
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Multiple predators   Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 21 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod density 0.5283 0.4242 0.0004 6 200 Fig. 8
12 Flach and de Bruin (1994) Multiple predators   Corophium volutator,
C. arenarium,
amphipods
  Predator effect is enhanced in the presence of competitors (the lugworm Arenicola marina and the cockle Cerastoderma edule) that make amphipods move around more. marine field 21 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no amphipod density 0.5872 0.4619 0.0024 6 200 Fig. 8
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Baetis sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.8666 0.6241 0.6623 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Baetis sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.9461 0.6658 0.2579 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Paraleptophlebia sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.9212 0.6530 1.0184 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Paraleptophlebia sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.8002 0.5879 0.6858 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Ephemerella sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.8764 0.6293 0.9440 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Ephemerella sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI yes percent drifting; percent consumed 1.4653 0.9023 12.2114 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Eurylophella sp.,
Mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.2500 0.2231 91.3961 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Eurylophella sp.,
Mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI yes percent drifting; percent consumed 1.2071 0.7917 0.6533 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Stenonema sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.3576 0.3057 0.3219 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
13 Forrester (1994) Salvelinus fontinalis,
brook charr
  Stenonema sp.,
mayfly
  Predators cause prey to drift in water column. freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent drifting; percent consumed 0.1422 0.1330 0.3741 3 n/a Figs. 1, 6
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Large-sized Poecilia reticulata,
guppy
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.9380 0.6617 0.0043 4 8 Table 1
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Small-sized Poecilia reticulata,
guppy
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.6006 0.4704 0.0595 4 8 Table 1
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Large-sized Rivulus hartii,
jumping guabine
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.6921 0.5260 0.0773 4 4 Table 1
14 Fraser and Gilliam (1992) Hoplias malabaricus,
fish
  Small-sized Rivulus hartii,
jumping guabine
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators freshwater field 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no percent of fish emigrating or dying 0.7504 0.5598 0.0077 4 8 Table 1
15 Grabowski, In Press Opsanus tau,
oyster toadfish
  Panopeus herbstii,
mud crab
Crassostrea virginica,
oyster
Prey hide from predators, lowering feeding rate marine lab 6 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total no percent oyster mortality 0.9820 0.6841 0.0008 5 40 Fig. 2
15 Grabowski, In Press Opsanus tau,
oyster toadfish
  Panopeus herbstii,
mud crab
Crassostrea virginica,
oyster
Prey hide from predators, lowering feeding rate marine lab 7 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total yes percent oyster mortality 0.9560 0.6709 0.0013 5 40 Fig. 2
16 Hansson (2000) Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
  Gonyostomum semen,
algae
  Algae reduce recruitment rate in presence of predator freshwater lab 5 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes recruitment rate (cells per meter per day) 0.6674 0.5113 0.0073 4 20 Figs. 6, 7
16 Hansson (2000) Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
  Gonyostomum semen,
algae
  Algae reduce recruitment rate in presence of predator freshwater lab 5 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no recruitment rate (cells per meter per day) 0.0313 0.0308 6.6198 4 20 Figs. 6, 7
16 Hansson (2000) Daphnia magna,
zooplankton
  Anabaena sp.,
algae
  Anabaena benefits from predator presence because of reduced competition from other algae that have delayed recruitment freshwater lab 5 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no recruitment rate (cells per meter per day) 0.0744 0.0718 0.0179 4 20 Figs. 6, 7
17 Hurd and Eisenberg (1984) Old field predators - not specified   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators terrestrial field 65 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no cumulative percent mortality and dispersal 0.9228 0.6538 0.0001 3 12595 Table 1, 'High'
17 Hurd and Eisenberg (1984) Old field predators - not specified   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators terrestrial field 65 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no cumulative percent mortality and dispersal 0.9350 0.6601 0.0001 3 4189 Table 1, 'Medium'
17 Hurd and Eisenberg (1984) Old field predators - not specified   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Prey emigrate to avoid predators terrestrial field 65 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no cumulative percent mortality and dispersal 0.9389 0.6621 0.0001 3 1303 Table 1, 'Low'
18 Kelly et al. (2002) Salmo salar,
salmon
Gammarus duebeni,
amphipod
Baetis rhodani, mayfly   Carnivorous amphipod Gammarus duebeni celticus increases drift of mayfly nymphs, thereby increasing contact with predatory salmon. freshwater lab 0.125 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of Baetis eaten by salmon 0.9736 0.6798 0.0046 12 10 Fig. 6
18 Kelly et al. (2002) Salmo salar,
salmon
Gammarus duebeni,
amphipod
Baetis rhodani, mayfly   Carnivorous amphipod Gammarus pulex increases drift of mayfly nymphs, thereby increasing contact with predatory salmon. freshwater lab 0.125 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no number of Baetis eaten by salmon 0.9729 0.6795 0.0094 12 10 Fig. 6
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.2449 0.2191 0.0057 2 100 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.6506 0.5011 0.0001 2 200 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.5328 0.4271 0.0001 2 300 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.3035 0.2650 0.0012 2 400 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.2586 0.2300 0.0002 2 800 Fig. 3
19 Kratz (1996) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis bicaudata,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 1.5 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality, per predator 0.5275 0.4236 0.0001 2 1600 Fig. 3
20 Lancaster (1990) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Baetis sp.,
mayfly
  Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total no daily per capita mortality and drift 5.0857 1.8059 0.0533 10 n/a Table 3, Fig. 3A
20 Lancaster (1990) Doroneuria baumanni,
stonefly
  Chironomidae, flies   Prey emigrate (drift) to avoid predators freshwater field 25 two-level emigration TMI, Total no daily per capita mortality and drift 0.1306 0.1227 0.2975 10 n/a Table 3, Fig. 3B
21 Losey and Denno (1998a) Harpalus faunus,
ground beetle
Coccinella septempunctata,
ladybird beetle
Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids drop off plants to avoid foliar predator, increase exposure to ground predator. terrestrial lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no aphids eaten/day 0.2289 0.2061 0.0032 8 30 Fig. 4: A. pisum
21 Losey and Denno (1998a) Harpalus faunus,
ground beetle
Coccinella septempunctata,
ladybird beetle
Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids drop off plants to avoid foliar predator, increase exposure to ground predator. terrestrial lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes aphids eaten/day 0.0643 0.0623 0.0388 8 30 Fig. 4: A. kondoi
22 Losey and Denno (1998b) Harpalus faunus,
ground beetle
Coccinella septempunctata,
ladybird beetle
Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids drop off plants to avoid foliar predator, increase exposure to ground predator. terrestrial lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no aphids eaten/day 0.0692 0.0669 0.0613 11 30 Fig. 2
22 Losey and Denno (1998b) Harpalus faunus,
ground beetle
Coccinella septempunctata,
ladybird beetle
Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids drop off plants to avoid foliar predator, increase exposure to ground predator. terrestrial lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI yes aphids eaten/day 0.2162 0.1958 0.0118 11 30 Fig. 2
22 Losey and Denno (1998b) Harpalus faunus,
ground beetle
Coccinella septempunctata,
ladybird beetle
Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids drop off plants to avoid foliar predator, increase exposure to ground predator. terrestrial lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no aphids eaten/day 0.4389 0.3638 0.0072 11 30 Fig. 2
23 McIntosh and Townsend (1996) Galaxias vulgaris,
river galaxia
  Stream invertebrates Algae Presence of predatory fish reduces invertebrate activity; reduced feeding increases algae on rocks. freshwater field 14 three-level reduced activity DMI , TMI no algal density (ash free dry mass) 1.0003 0.6933 0.0017 3 4 Fig. 4
23 McIntosh and Townsend (1996) Galaxias vulgaris,
river galaxia
  Stream invertebrates Algae Presence of predatory fish reduces invertebrate activity; reduced feeding increases algae on rocks. freshwater field 14 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI yes algal density (ash free dry mass) 1.1343 0.7581 0.0134 3 4 Fig. 4
23 McIntosh and Townsend (1996) Galaxias vulgaris,
river galaxia
  Stream invertebrates Algae Presence of predatory fish reduces invertebrate activity; reduced feeding increases algae on rocks. freshwater field 14 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI yes algal density (ash free dry mass) 1.0601 0.7228 0.0036 3 4 Fig. 4
23 McIntosh and Townsend (1996) Salmo trutta,
brown trout
  Stream invertebrates Algae Presence of predatory fish reduces invertebrate activity; reduced feeding increases algae on rocks. freshwater field 14 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI yes algal density (ash free dry mass) 1.1117 0.7475 0.0249 3 4 Fig. 4
23 McIntosh and Townsend (1996) Salmo trutta,
brown trout
  Stream invertebrates Algae Presence of predatory fish reduces invertebrate activity; reduced feeding increases algae on rocks. freshwater field 14 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI yes algal density (ash free dry mass) 1.0360 0.7110 0.0025 3 4 Fig. 4
24 Moran and Hurd (1994) cursorial spiders   Tenodera sinensis,
Chinese mantid
  Mantids emigrate to escape spiders terrestrial field 13 two-level emigration TMI, Total no number of mantids captured emigrating or remaining in enclosures 0.1463 0.1366 0.0007 5 120 Text, pg. 270
25 Nelson et al. (2004) Nabis sp.,
damselbug
  Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Predators interrupt prey feeding activity terrestrial field 28 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no population growth rate 0.7759 0.5743 0.0109 22-24 12 Fig. 3
25 Nelson et al. (2004) Nabis sp.,
damselbug
  Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Predators interrupt prey feeding activity terrestrial field 14 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no population growth rate 0.3910 0.3301 0.0050 45-55 10 Fig. 3
26 Pierce (1988) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Tetragoneuria cynosura,
Ladona deplanata,
dragonflies
  Prey avoid colonizing habitats with predators freshwater field 120 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes dragonfly density 1.0811 0.7329 0.0539 8 n/a Fig. 1
26 Pierce (1988) Lepomis macrochirus, bluegill   Tetragoneuria cynosura,
Ladona deplanata,
dragonflies
  Prey avoid colonizing habitats with predators freshwater field 120 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes dragonfly density 1.1328 0.7575 0.0463 8 n/a Fig. 1
27 Rahel and Stein (1988) Orconectes rusticus, crayfish Micropterus dolomieu,
smallmouth bass
Etheostoma nigrum,
johnny darter
  Crayfish eat darters and facilitate bass predation. freshwater lab 0.02 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI, Total no number of darters eaten 0.0651 0.0630 19.0806 16 8 Fig. 1
27 Rahel and Stein (1988) Orconectes rusticus, crayfish Micropterus dolomieu,
smallmouth bass
Etheostoma nigrum,
johnny darter
  Crayfish eat darters and facilitate bass predation. freshwater lab 0.02 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI, Total no number of darters eaten 0.0042 0.0042 199.2117 16 8 Fig. 1
28 Relyea (2002) Anax longipes   Hyla versicolor, gray treefrog   None observed freshwater lab 13 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes percent of tadpoles surviving 0.0860 0.0825 0.0413 6 60 Fig. 2
29 Relyea and Yurewicz (2002) Anax sp.,
dragonfly
  Rana clamitans,
green frog
  Predators reduce foraging activity freshwater lab 21 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no survival over 3 weeks 0.0252 0.0249 0.0101 5 200 Fig. 3
29 Relyea and Yurewicz (2002) Ambystoma tigrinum,
tiger salamander
  Rana clamitans,
green frog
  Predators reduce foraging activity freshwater lab 21 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no survival over 3 weeks 0.0055 0.0055 0.0927 5 200 Fig. 3
29 Relyea and Yurewicz (2002) Anax sp.,
Ambystoma tigrinum,
both as predators
  Rana clamitans,
green frog
  Predators reduce foraging activity freshwater lab 21 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no survival over 3 weeks 0.0616 0.0598 0.0039 5 200 Fig. 3
30 Roitberg et al. (1979) Coccinella californica,
ladybird beetle
  Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids jump off plants to avoid foliar predators, increasing mortality. terrestrial field 5 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no mortality to predators, or on ground 0.4000 0.3365 0.0113 12 15 Table 4
30 Roitberg et al. (1979) Coccinella californica,
ladybird beetle
  Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids jump off plants to avoid foliar predators, increasing mortality. terrestrial field 5 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no mortality to predators, or on ground 0.4667 0.3830 0.0078 12 15 Table 4
30 Roitberg et al. (1979) Coccinella californica,
ladybird beetle
  Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Aphids jump off plants to avoid foliar predators, increasing mortality. terrestrial field 5 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no mortality to predators, or on ground 0.6323 0.4900 0.0009 12 15 Table 4
31 Rudgers et al. (2003) Forelius pruinosus,
ant
  Bucculatrix thurberiella,
cotton leaf perforator moth
Gossypium thurberi,
wild cotton
Predators reduce leaf damage by killing caterpillars, and by reducing caterpillar foraging rates terrestrial field 365 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total no increase in prey density compared to plants with ants; increase in plant damage compared to plants with ants 0.4465 0.3691 0.0080 28 15 Text, pg. 54
31 Rudgers et al. (2003) Forelius pruinosus,
ant
  Bucculatrix thurberiella,
cotton leaf perforator moth
Gossypium thurberi,
wild cotton
Predators reduce leaf damage by killing caterpillars, and by reducing caterpillar foraging rates terrestrial field 730 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total no increase in prey density compared to plants with ants; increase in plant damage compared to plants with ants 0.5912 0.4645 0.0025 31 15 Text, pg. 54
32 Schmitz (1998) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum, red-legged grasshopper   Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grasshopper density 1.5000 0.9163 2.1498 10 6 Table 3
32 Schmitz (1998) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Chorthippus curtipennis, grasshopper   Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grasshopper density 1.5000 0.9163 0.5589 10 6 Table 3
32 Schmitz (1998) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum, red-legged grasshopper grasses Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grass biomass 1.2920 0.8294 0.1156 10 6 Fig. 4
32 Schmitz (1998) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Chorthippus curtipennis, grasshopper grasses Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grass biomass 2.1970 1.1622 0.2689 10 6 Fig. 4
32 Schmitz (1998) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum, red-legged grasshopper herbs Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total no herb biomass 0.3205 0.2780 0.2309 10 6 Fig. 4
32 Schmitz (1998) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Chorthippus curtipennis, grasshopper herbs Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 60 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes herb biomass 1.4643 0.9019 3.2082 10 6 Fig. 4
33 Schmitz et al. (1997) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum, red-legged grasshopper   Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 30 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grasshopper density 0.6760 0.5164 0.0653 8 10 Fig. 5
33 Schmitz et al. (1997) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum, red-legged grasshopper grasses Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 30 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total no grass biomass 0.2085 0.1894 0.1920 8 10 Fig. 6
33 Schmitz et al. (1997) Pisurina mira,
nursery web hunting spider
  Melanoplus femurrubrum, red-legged grasshopper forbs Grasshoppers reduce feeding rates in presence of spiders. terrestrial field 30 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total no forb biomass 1.1778 0.7783 0.3752 8 10 Fig. 6
34 Scrimgeour and Culp (1994) Rhinichthys cataractae,
longnose dace
  Classenia sabulosa,
stonefly
Baetis tricaudatus, mayfly Stonefly reduces feeding rate in presence of predator freshwater lab 0.04 three-level emigration DMI, TMI no mean attack rate (number of attacks/hour/larvae) by Claassenia 0.9807 0.6834 0.0086 5 1 Tables 2 and 3
34 Scrimgeour and Culp (1994) Rhinichthys cataractae,
longnose dace
  Classenia sabulosa,
stonefly
Baetis tricaudatus, mayfly Stonefly reduces feeding rate in presence of predator freshwater lab 0.04 three-level emigration DMI, TMI no mean attack rate (number of attacks/hour/larvae) by Claassenia 0.9810 0.6836 0.0101 5 1 Tables 2 and 3
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.6437 0.4970 0.2225 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.8053 0.5907 0.0089 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.8430 0.6114 0.0025 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9481 0.6668 0.0115 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9532 0.6695 0.0033 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.5410 0.4324 0.0607 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.6863 0.5225 0.0147 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.8617 0.6215 0.0021 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9374 0.6613 0.0033 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.6902 0.5248 0.1953 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9147 0.6495 0.0241 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9416 0.6635 0.0021 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9477 0.6666 0.0014 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
35 Scrimgeour et al. (1991) Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Benthic algae   Herbivores eat algae, but their foraging activities also loosens algae from surface. freshwater lab 0.04 two-level algal disturbance DMI, TMI no loss of algal biomass and consumption rate by mayflies (mg/h) 0.9732 0.6797 0.0080 5 5 Figs. 2, 3, and 4
36 Soluk and Collins (1988) Cottus bairdi,
sculpin
Agnetina capitata,
stonefly
Baetis tricaudatus,
mayfly
  Sculpins reduce stonefly feeding rate on mayflies. freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, Total yes number of mayflies eaten (DMI:# eaten by sculpins; TMI # eaten by stoneflies) 1.8660 1.0529 0.0013 5 150 Fig. 3
36 Soluk and Collins (1988) Agnetina capitata,
stonefly
Cottus bairdi,
sculpin
Ephemerella subvaria,
mayfly
  Stoneflies facilitate sculpin feeding on mayflies freshwater lab 1 two-level predator facilitation DMI, Total no number of mayflies eaten (DMI:# eaten by stoneflies TMI # eaten by sculpins 0.6830 0.5206 0.0040 6 75 Fig. 6
37 Stamp and Bowers (1988) Polistes dominulus and P. fuscatus, Vespid wasps   Hemileuca lucina, Saturniidae catepillars   None observed terrestrial field 11 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no number of catepillars surviving out of 25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0081 5 25 Text
38 Stamp and Bowers (1991) Polistes dominulus,
Polistes fuscatus,
wasps
  Hemileuca lucina,
moth
  Prey reduce feeding rate in presence of predators terrestrial field 11 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI, Total no caterpillar mortality 0.3350 0.2889 0.0078 15 25 Table 2
39 Stamp and Bowers (1993) Podisus maculiventris,
stinkbug
  Junonia coenia,
butterfly
  Prey reduce feeding rate in presence of predators terrestrial field 12 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no caterpillar mortality 0.0267 0.0263 0.0019 15 4 Table 2
39 Stamp and Bowers (1993) Polistes fuscatus,
wasps
  Junonia coenia,
butterfly
  Prey reduce feeding rate in presence of predators terrestrial field 13 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no caterpillar mortality 0.0410 0.0402 0.0352 15 4 Table 2
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Chironomidae, midge fly   Dragonfly both eats and scares away prey freshwater field 100 two-level emigration TMI, Total no number of exuviae per pool 0.6867 0.5228 1.5840 6 n/a Fig. 3A
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Ceratopogonidae, fly   Dragonfly both eats and scares away prey freshwater field 100 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number of exuviae per pool 0.3621 0.3090 1.1869 6 n/a Fig. 3B
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Daphnia sp.   Dragonfly both eats and scares away prey freshwater field 100 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number 0.1038 0.0987 1.5624 6 n/a Fig. 4A
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Heterocypris   Dragonfly both eats and scares away prey freshwater field 100 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number 4.6538 1.7323 17.5004 6 n/a Fig. 4B
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Culiseta longiareolata,
mosquito
  Dragonfly both eats and scares away prey freshwater field 100 two-level emigration TMI, Total yes number of exuviae per pool 0.6355 0.4920 3.7683 6 n/a Fig. 2D
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Culiseta longiareolata,
mosquito
periphyton Dragonfly both eats and scares away ovipositing mosquitoes, leading to trophic cascade in the food web freshwater field 100 three-level emigration TMI, Total yes periphyton biomass 1.0543 0.7199 0.0856 6 4 Fig. 5A
40 Stav et al. (2000) Anax imperator,
dragonfly
  Culiseta longiareolata,
mosquito
Phytoplankton Dragonfly both eats and scares away ovipositing mosquitoes, leading to trophic cascade in the food web freshwater field 42 three-level emigration TMI, Total yes phytoplankton biomass 1.0377 0.7118 0.8133 6 1 Fig. 5B
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Macroinvertebrates   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 1.3462 0.8528 0.2436 5 n/a Fig. 1
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Chironomidae   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.8864 0.6347 10.6195 5 n/a Fig. 4
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Baetidae   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.0955 0.0912 81.2614 5 n/a Fig. 4
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Hydroptilidae   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.2200 0.1989 7.7786 5 n/a Fig. 4
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Copepoda   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.4415 0.3657 6.6122 5 n/a Fig. 4
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Ancylidae   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.6200 0.4824 4.2911 5 n/a Fig. 4
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
rainbow darter
Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
Tricorythidae   Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 42 two-level reduced activity DMI, TMI no percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.2080 0.1890 4.8396 5 n/a Fig. 4
41 Stelzer and Lamberti (1999) Etheostoma caeruleum,
darter
  Orconectes propinquus,
crayfish
periphyton Darters reduce crayfish consumption of invertebrates. freshwater field 44 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes percent difference in density compared to exclosures 0.0976 0.0931 3.5491 5 n/a Fig. 3
42 Stoks et al. (1999) Aeshna cyanea,
dragonfly
  Lestes sponsa,
damselfly
  Reduced foraging due to anti-predator behaviors. freshwater field 11 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no number surviving of 20 0.1090 0.1034 0.0021 4 20 Fig. 1
42 Stoks et al. (1999) Aeshna cyanea,
dragonfly
  Lestes sponsa,
damselfly
  Reduced foraging due to anti-predator behaviors. freshwater field 11 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes number surviving of 20 1.1883 0.7831 0.0008 4 20 Fig. 1
43 Tamaki et al. (1970) Aphidius smithi,
wasp
  Acyrthosiphon pisum,
pea aphid
  Reduced feeding activity in presence of predator terrestrial field 7 two-level reduced activity TMI, Total no aphid density 0.4917 0.3999 0.0479 8 3 Fig. 6
44 Turner and Mittelbach (1990) Micropterus salmoides,
largemouth bass
  Lepomis macrochirus,
bluegill
Daphnia pulex,
cladoceran
Bluegill avoid bass predation by hiding in macrophyte vegetation and avoid openwater, releasing openwater zooplankton from predation. freshwater field 70 three-level spatial shift DMI, TMI no zooplankton density 1.0000 0.6931 0.0045 4 400 Fig. 1
44 Turner and Mittelbach (1990) Micropterus salmoides,
largemouth bass
  Lepomis macrochirus,
bluegill
Diaphanosoma brachyurum,
cladoceran
Bluegill avoid bass predation by hiding in macrophyte vegetation and avoid openwater, releasing openwater zooplankton from predation. freshwater field 70 three-level spatial shift DMI, TMI no zooplankton density 1.0000 0.6931 0.0001 4 400 Fig. 1
44 Turner and Mittelbach (1990) Micropterus salmoides,
largemouth bass
  Lepomis macrochirus,
bluegill
Ceriodaphnia reticulata,
cladoceran
Bluegill avoid bass predation by hiding in macrophyte vegetation and avoid openwater, releasing openwater zooplankton from predation. freshwater field 70 three-level spatial shift DMI, TMI no zooplankton density 1.0000 0.6931 0.0028 4 400 Fig. 2
44 Turner and Mittelbach (1990) Micropterus salmoides,
largemouth bass
  Lepomis macrochirus,
bluegill
Chaoborus americanus,
Chaoborus flavicans,
phantom midges
Bluegill avoid bass predation by hiding in macrophyte vegetation and avoid openwater, releasing openwater zooplankton from predation. freshwater field 70 three-level spatial shift DMI, TMI no zooplankton density 1.0000 0.6931 0.0001 4 400 Fig. 2
45 Weissberger (1999) Asterias forbesi, sea star,
Euspira heros, moon snail,
predators act additively
  Spisula solidissima,
surfclam
  Moon snails eat few clams, but elevate clam mortality when present with sea stars marine lab 3 two-level predator facilitation DMI, TMI no clam daily mortality rate 0.9248 0.6548 0.0017 4 100 Fig. 1
46 Winkelman and Aho (1993) Esox niger,
pickerel
  Gambusia holbrooki,
adult mosquitofish
Gambusia holbrooki,
juvenile mosquitofish,
Adult mosquitofish shift habitats to avoid predators, releasing juvenile mosquito fish from cannibalism freshwater lab 15 three-level spatial shift DMI, TMI no survival of juvenile mosquitofish 0.9999 0.6931 0.2457 4 n/a Fig. 1B
46 Winkelman and Aho (1993) Esox niger,
pickerel
  Gambusia holbrooki,
adult mosquitofish
Gambusia holbrooki,
juvenile mosquitofish,
Adult mosquitofish shift habitats to avoid predators, releasing juvenile mosquito fish from cannibalism freshwater lab 15 three-level spatial shift DMI, TMI no survival of juvenile mosquitofish 1.0000 0.6931 2.0207 4 n/a Fig. 1B
47 Wissinger and McGrady (1993) Tramea lacerata, dragonfly   Enallagma aspersum, damselfly Ischnura verticalis, damselfly Tramea sp. can eat Erythemis dragonflies and reduce Erythemis feeding rate on its damselfly prey freshwater lab 14 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI yes number of damselflies eaten by Enallagma 0.6954 0.5279 0.0009 4 80 Figs. 4,5
47 Wissinger and McGrady (1994) Erythemis simplicollis, dragonfly   Enallagma aspersum, damselfly Ischnura verticalis, damselfly Tramea sp. can eat Erythemis dragonflies and reduce Erythemis feeding rate on its damselfly prey freshwater lab 14 three-level reduced activity DMI, TMI yes number of damselflies eaten by Enallagma 0.0996 0.0950 0.0352 4 80 Figs. 4,5
48 Wissinger et al. (1999) Ambystoma tigrinum,
tiger salamander
  Asynarchus nigriculus,
caddisfly
Limnephilus externus,
caddisfly
Salamders modify behavior of intermediate predator, causing decreasing Limnephilus mortality freshwater lab 10 three-level reduced activity TMI, Total yes survival out of 20 initial Limnephilus 0.1603 0.1487 0.0152 4 20 Fig. 7
49 Woodward and Hildrew (2002) Cordulegaster boltonii, dragonfly nymph   Plectrocnemia conspersa   None observed freshwater lab 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality 0.0024 0.0024 11339.0079 1 58 Table 2
49 Woodward and Hildrew (2002) Cordulegaster boltonii, dragonfly nymph   Nemurella pictetii, stonefly   None observed freshwater lab 1 two-level emigration DMI, TMI no per capita prey emigration or mortality 0.0328 0.0323 6.6993 1 400 Table 2

Only TMI was measured directly. However, there is evidence that the intermediate taxon in the cascade (the prey) experiences no density reduction. We therefore set DMI = Control since there is no density reduction of prey.

Variance of the preceeding column, ln(abs(RR) + 1).

§Secondary predator applies to cases where predator-predator facilitation generates a TME: the presence of the primary predator has a detrimental effect on the prey by increasing the prey's mortality to the secondary predator

b: RR calculated as ((TM – C)/C)/((total – c)/c)

c: RR calculated as ((TM – C)/C)/((TM – C)/C + (DM – c)/c)



[Back to E086-026]