Appendix F. Size-frequency distributions at each site in 2000, 2003, and 2006; and results of log-linear analysis of Conch Reef size-frequency data.
Size-frequency distributions at all sites became increasingly dominated by smaller sponges (Fig F1). Size-frequency distributions were significantly different among years and between sites (Table F1).
![]() |
| FIG. F1. Size-frequency distributions of Xestospongia muta at (A) 15 m Conch Reef, (B) 20 m Conch Reef, (C) 30 m Conch Reef, and (D) 15 m Pickles Reef in 2000, 2003, and 2006. |
TABLE F1. Log-linear analysis of Conch Reef size-frequency data. Analyses were based on a three-way contingency table with the response variable state, S, (six stages), and explanatory variables time, T, (three years), and location, L, (four sites).
G2 |
df |
P |
Contrast |
Effect |
∆G2 |
∆df |
P |
|
M1 = TL, S |
134.895 |
55 |
<0.001 |
M2 vs. M1 |
T |
42.065 |
10 |
<0.001 |
M2 = TL, TS |
92.830 |
45 |
<0.001 |
M4 vs. M3 |
T |
42.252 |
10 |
<0.001 |
M3 = TL, LS |
79.193 |
40 |
<0.001 |
M3 vs. M1 |
L |
55.702 |
15 |
<0.001 |
M4 = TL, TS, LS |
36.941 |
30 |
0.179 |
M4 vs. M2 |
L |
55.889 |
15 |
<0.001 |
M5 = STL |
0 |
0 |
1.000 |
M5 vs. M4 |
T × L |
36.941 |
30 |
0.222 |