Ecological Archives E087-091-A1

David G. Jenkins. 2006. In search of quorum effects in metacommunity structure: species co-occurrence analyses. Ecology 87:1523–1531.

Appendix A. Analyzed data sets, including the assignment to temporal-spatial categories based on Table 1, information about the studied systems, and notes on adjustments to the data sets that were made before analyses. Max. Distance is the maximum inter-site distance as described in the paper or estimated from information provided. Study designations (e.g., 1A) are also used in Appendix B.


Assigned category

System

Sampling regime and designation (island or sample) for analyses

Max. distance (km)

Community taxa

No. species

No. sites

Notes: data sources and data handling for this analysis


1. Early local

A. Kling et al. (1992) Subset of small lakes in arctic Alaska, USA

Sampled once each during 1986-1990. (Sample)

2

Anostraca, Cladocera, Copepoda

11

4

Table 6. Lakes 8-12 selected as a local subset, and considered “early” due to Arctic location.

 

B. Jenkins and Buikema (1998) New (< 1 y) permanent ponds in Virginia, USA

Sampled repeatedly in 1989-1990

(Island)

0.1

Chaoborus, Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera

61

12

Table 3. Twelve replicate (same dimensions, conditions) ponds, fishless. Community function (productivity, respiration, nutrient regeneration) also collected.

 

C. Wissinger et al. (1999) Subalpine wetlands in central Colorado, USA

Sampled repeatedly (Island)

0.6

Anostraca, Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda, Rotifera

13

41

Table 31.1. Zooplankton species only (benthic insects excluded). Authors considered hydroperiod, area, and salamander predation important to composition.

 

D. Havel et al. (2000) Scour ponds subset, connected to Missouri River, USA

Sampled repeatedly 1994-1997.

(Island)

75

Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda

71

6

Data provided by J. Havel. Scours formed when the Missouri River flooded and breached levees (1993). Connected scours were considered as “local” due to river flow.

 

E. Swadling et al. (2000) Subset of Northern-most 4 lakes in Arctic, Canada

Sampled once 1990.

(Sample)

50

Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera

12

4

Table 2. Lakes 22-25 selected as a local subset and considered “early” due to Arctic location.

               

2. Early region

A. Hebert and Hann (1986) Arctic tundra pond sites

Some ponds sampled repeatedly, multiple ponds sampled per site.

(Island)

3976

Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Notostraca, Ostracoda

78

14

Table 2. Eleven arctic sites (multiple ponds per site) from Greenland to Alaska, all fishless. Each site had multiple ponds (i.e., multiple samples per site).

 

B. Kling et al. (1992) Lakes in arctic Alaska, USA

Sampled once each during 1986-1990.

(Sample)

220

Anostraca, Chaoborus, Cladocera, Copepoda

12

45

Table 6.

 

C. Havel et al. (2000) All sampled scour ponds in Missouri River floodplain, central Missouri, USA

Sampled repeatedly 1994-1997.

(Island)

120

Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda

73

13

Data provided by J. Havel. Scours were formed in 1993 when Missouri River breached levees. All scours considered “regional” due to varying connectivity to the river.

 

D. Swadling et al. (2000) Lakes in a N-S transect through Yukon and Northwest Territories, Canada

Sampled once 1990.

(Sample)

1070

Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera

41

30

Table 2. Vegetation surrounding lakes varied along the transect as boreal forest, forest-tundra, and alpine tundra.

 

E. Louette and DeMeester (2005) Newly-dug shallow ponds across Flanders, Belgium

Sampled repeatedly 2002.

(Island)

216

Cladocera

20

25

Table 1. Unconnected to other surface waters. Regional species richness considered important to new communities.

               

3. Late local

A. Jenkins et al. (2003) Ephemeral wetlands, Illinois, USA (Jenkins, unpublished data)

Sampled repeatedly 1998, fishless.

(Island)

0.4

Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Ostracoda

29

13

Jenkins, unpublished data (summarized in Jenkins et al., 2003). Hydroperiod considered important to species richness.

 

B. Coastal rock pools, Rock B subset (Kolasa, unpublished data)

Sampled repeatedly 1989-2001.

(Island)

0.002

Amphipoda, Annelida, Cladocera, Copepoda, Decapoda, Insecta, Isopoda, Ostracoda, Rotifera, Turbellaria

21

5

Data provided by J. Kolasa (see Kolasa et al. 1996, Therriault and Kolasa 1999, and Romanuk and Kolasa 2002). Rock B is isolated from other sets of pools on other rocks in a cove.

 

C. Shurin (2000). Permanent ponds within Kellogg Biological Station, southern Michigan, USA,

Sampled 6 times in 90 days, all fishless.

(Island)

~10

Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera

58

7

 Appendix A. Species sampled initially (code “n”), or in controls and subsequent pond samples (code “s”) were analyzed; those found in invasion treatments (code “i”) but never in control or pond samples were excluded from analyses.

 

D. Shurin (2000) Appendix B. Two semipermanent and two permanent ponds in Barry County, southern Michigan, USA

Sampled 3 times in 1.5 months. 

(Island)

~10

Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera

52

4

Table 2.

 

E. Schell et al. (2001), subset. Southern-most 10 ponds in study, Wisconsin, USA

Sampled once 1996. (Sample)

90

Chaoborus, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Ostracoda

22

10

Tables 1 and 2, Figure 1. Sites varied (e.g., sedge meadow, natural kettle, former corn field, woodland pond, dredged urban pond).

               

4. Late region

A. Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA (Taylor and Debiase, unpublished data)

Sampled repeatedly.

(Island)

25

Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda

91

87

Data provided by B. Taylor (also see Mahoney et al. 1990). Carolina Bays and wetlands (geologically-young impoundments excluded). Only definitively identified species were used in analyses..



B. Coastal rock pools, Discovery Bay Marine Lab, Jamaica (Kolasa, unpublished data)

Sampled repeatedly 1989-2001.

(Island)

0.1

Amphipoda, Annelida, Cladocera, Copepoda, Decapoda, Insecta, Isopoda, Ostracoda, Rotifera, Turbellaria

70

49

Pools are embedded in a complex landscape (see Kolasa et al. 1996, Therriault and Kolasa 1999, and Romanuk and Kolasa 2002), and vary in size, salinity and dessication frequency.

 

C. USEPA EMAP Eastern USA lakes.(a)

Sampled once 1986.

(Sample)

500

Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera

142

127

Twenty lakes removed for analyses because no surface area data were available.

 

D. King et al. (1996) Temporary ponds on N-S transect in northern California, USA

Sampled repeatedly 1992.

(Island)

180

Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Ostracoda

70

58

Appendix B. 4 different habitat types.

 

E. Schell et al. (2001) Ponds and wetlands in Wisconsin, USA

Sampled once 1996.

(Sample)

500

Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Diptera, Ostracoda

52

54

Table 1.


(a) http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/dataI/surfwatr/data/napap/els.html



[Back to E087-091]