Appendix A. Analyzed data sets, including the assignment to temporal-spatial categories based on Table 1, information about the studied systems, and notes on adjustments to the data sets that were made before analyses. Max. Distance is the maximum inter-site distance as described in the paper or estimated from information provided. Study designations (e.g., 1A) are also used in Appendix B.
Assigned category |
System |
Sampling regime and designation (island or sample) for analyses |
Max. distance (km) |
Community taxa |
No. species |
No. sites |
Notes: data sources and data handling for this analysis |
1. Early local |
A. Kling et al. (1992) Subset of small lakes in arctic Alaska, USA |
Sampled once each during 1986-1990. (Sample) |
2 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Copepoda |
11 |
4 |
Table 6. Lakes 8-12 selected as a local subset, and considered “early” due to Arctic location. |
B. Jenkins and Buikema (1998) New (< 1 y) permanent ponds in Virginia, USA |
Sampled repeatedly in 1989-1990 (Island) |
0.1 |
Chaoborus, Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera |
61 |
12 |
Table 3. Twelve replicate (same dimensions, conditions) ponds, fishless. Community function (productivity, respiration, nutrient regeneration) also collected. |
|
C. Wissinger et al. (1999) Subalpine wetlands in central Colorado, USA |
Sampled repeatedly (Island) |
0.6 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda, Rotifera |
13 |
41 |
Table 31.1. Zooplankton species only (benthic insects excluded). Authors considered hydroperiod, area, and salamander predation important to composition. |
|
D. Havel et al. (2000) Scour ponds subset, connected to Missouri River, USA |
Sampled repeatedly 1994-1997. (Island) |
75 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda |
71 |
6 |
Data provided by J. Havel. Scours formed when the Missouri River flooded and breached levees (1993). Connected scours were considered as “local” due to river flow. |
|
E. Swadling et al. (2000) Subset of Northern-most 4 lakes in Arctic, Canada |
Sampled once 1990. (Sample) |
50 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera |
12 |
4 |
Table 2. Lakes 22-25 selected as a local subset and considered “early” due to Arctic location. |
|
2. Early region |
A. Hebert and Hann (1986) Arctic tundra pond sites |
Some ponds sampled repeatedly, multiple ponds sampled per site. (Island) |
3976 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Notostraca, Ostracoda |
78 |
14 |
Table 2. Eleven arctic sites (multiple ponds per site) from Greenland to Alaska, all fishless. Each site had multiple ponds (i.e., multiple samples per site). |
B. Kling et al. (1992) Lakes in arctic Alaska, USA |
Sampled once each during 1986-1990. (Sample) |
220 |
Anostraca, Chaoborus, Cladocera, Copepoda |
12 |
45 |
Table 6. |
|
C. Havel et al. (2000) All sampled scour ponds in Missouri River floodplain, central Missouri, USA |
Sampled repeatedly 1994-1997. (Island) |
120 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Ostracoda |
73 |
13 |
Data provided by J. Havel. Scours were formed in 1993 when Missouri River breached levees. All scours considered “regional” due to varying connectivity to the river. |
|
D. Swadling et al. (2000) Lakes in a N-S transect through Yukon and Northwest Territories, Canada |
Sampled once 1990. (Sample) |
1070 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera |
41 |
30 |
Table 2. Vegetation surrounding lakes varied along the transect as boreal forest, forest-tundra, and alpine tundra. |
|
E. Louette and DeMeester (2005) Newly-dug shallow ponds across Flanders, Belgium |
Sampled repeatedly 2002. (Island) |
216 |
Cladocera |
20 |
25 |
Table 1. Unconnected to other surface waters. Regional species richness considered important to new communities. |
|
3. Late local |
A. Jenkins et al. (2003) Ephemeral wetlands, Illinois, USA (Jenkins, unpublished data) |
Sampled repeatedly 1998, fishless. (Island) |
0.4 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Ostracoda |
29 |
13 |
Jenkins, unpublished data (summarized in Jenkins et al., 2003). Hydroperiod considered important to species richness. |
B. Coastal rock pools, Rock B subset (Kolasa, unpublished data) |
Sampled repeatedly 1989-2001. (Island) |
0.002 |
Amphipoda, Annelida, Cladocera, Copepoda, Decapoda, Insecta, Isopoda, Ostracoda, Rotifera, Turbellaria |
21 |
5 |
Data provided by J. Kolasa (see Kolasa et al. 1996, Therriault and Kolasa 1999, and Romanuk and Kolasa 2002). Rock B is isolated from other sets of pools on other rocks in a cove. |
|
C. Shurin (2000). Permanent ponds within Kellogg Biological Station, southern Michigan, USA, |
Sampled 6 times in 90 days, all fishless. (Island) |
~10 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera |
58 |
7 |
Appendix A. Species sampled initially (code “n”), or in controls and subsequent pond samples (code “s”) were analyzed; those found in invasion treatments (code “i”) but never in control or pond samples were excluded from analyses. |
|
D. Shurin (2000) Appendix B. Two semipermanent and two permanent ponds in Barry County, southern Michigan, USA |
Sampled 3 times in 1.5 months. (Island) |
~10 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera |
52 |
4 |
Table 2. |
|
E. Schell et al. (2001), subset. Southern-most 10 ponds in study, Wisconsin, USA |
Sampled once 1996. (Sample) |
90 |
Chaoborus, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Ostracoda |
22 |
10 |
Tables 1 and 2, Figure 1. Sites varied (e.g., sedge meadow, natural kettle, former corn field, woodland pond, dredged urban pond). |
|
4. Late region |
A. Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA (Taylor and Debiase, unpublished data) |
Sampled repeatedly. (Island) |
25 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda |
91 |
87 |
Data provided by B. Taylor (also see Mahoney et al. 1990). Carolina Bays and wetlands (geologically-young impoundments excluded). Only definitively identified species were used in analyses.. |
B. Coastal rock pools, Discovery Bay Marine Lab, Jamaica (Kolasa, unpublished data) |
Sampled repeatedly 1989-2001. (Island) |
0.1 |
Amphipoda, Annelida, Cladocera, Copepoda, Decapoda, Insecta, Isopoda, Ostracoda, Rotifera, Turbellaria |
70 |
49 |
Pools are embedded in a complex landscape (see Kolasa et al. 1996, Therriault and Kolasa 1999, and Romanuk and Kolasa 2002), and vary in size, salinity and dessication frequency. |
|
C. USEPA EMAP Eastern USA lakes.(a) |
Sampled once 1986. (Sample) |
500 |
Cladocera, Copepoda, Rotifera |
142 |
127 |
Twenty lakes removed for analyses because no surface area data were available. |
|
D. King et al. (1996) Temporary ponds on N-S transect in northern California, USA |
Sampled repeatedly 1992. (Island) |
180 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Ostracoda |
70 |
58 |
Appendix B. 4 different habitat types. |
|
E. Schell et al. (2001) Ponds and wetlands in Wisconsin, USA |
Sampled once 1996. (Sample) |
500 |
Anostraca, Cladocera, Conchostraca, Copepoda, Diptera, Ostracoda |
52 |
54 |
Table 1. |
|
(a) http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/dataI/surfwatr/data/napap/els.html