Jonathan M. Levine, A. Kathryn McEachern, and Clark Cowan. 2010. Do competitors modulate rare plant response to precipitation change? Ecology 91:130–140.

Appendix A. Figures showing additional demographic responses to precipitation and vegetation manipulations for the three focal species of the study.

FIG. A1. Gilia tenuiflora ssp. hoffmannii germination (A and B), and flowers produced per germinant (C and D) as a function of precipitation and competition treatments in 2004 and 2005. The precipitation treatments are control (C), drought and watered, imposed season-long (S), early-season (E), mid-season (M), or late season (L). Bars show means + 1 SE.

FIG. A2. Malacothrix indecora germination (A and B), and flowers produced per germinant (C and D) as a function of precipitation and competition treatments in 2004 and 2005. The precipitation treatments are control (C), drought and watered, imposed season-long (S), early-season (E), mid-season (M), or late season (L). Bars show means + 1 SE.

FIG. A3. Phacelia insularis var. insularis germination (A) and flowers produced per germinant (B) as a function or precipitation and competition treatments in 2004. The precipitation treatments are control (C), drought and watered, imposed season-long (S), early-season (E), or late season (L). Data from control and late season drought treatments were pooled (see text). Bars show means + 1 SE.