| Source | df | Mean Square | F | P | |
|
Latitude |
4 | 4522.63 | 8.77 | 0.0293* | |
| (40o + 30o) × (20o + 10o + 0o) | 1 | 10671.9 | 20.70 | 0.0104* | |
| 40o × 30o | 1 | 119.63 | 0.23 | 0.6651 | |
| 20o × (10o + 0o) | 1 | 3068.04 | 5.95 | 0.0712 | |
| 10o × 0o | 1 | 1675.01 | 3.25 |
0.1458 |
|
|
Site (Latitude) |
4 |
515.44 |
17.24 | 0.0001* | |
|
Plot (Site (Latitude)) |
135 | 29.90 | 2.21 | 0.0001* | |
| Category | 3 | 5893.08 | 435.15 | 0.0001* | |
|
(1 + 2 + 3) × 4 |
1 | 10915.9 |
806.03 |
0.0001* | |
| 1 × (2 + 3) | 1 | 88.33 | 6.52 | 0.0110* | |
| 2 × 3 | 1 | 6675.00 | 492.88 | 0.0001* | |
| Latitude × Category | 12 | 613.66 | 45.31 | 0.0001* | |
|
(40 + 30) vs. (20 + 10 + 0) × (1 + 2 + 3) vs.4 |
1 | 811.51 | 59.92 | 0.0001* | |
| (40 + 30) vs. (20 + 10 + 0) × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 0.61 | 0.04 | 0.8323 | |
| (40 + 30) vs. (20 + 10 + 0) × 2 vs. 3 | 1 |
1925.65 |
142.19 | 0.0001* | |
| 40 vs. 30 × (1 + 2 + 3) vs. 4 | 1 | 19.06 | 1.41 | 0.2361 | |
| 40 vs. 30 × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 374.07 | 27.62 | 0.0001* | |
| 40 vs. 30 × 2 vs. 3 | 1 | 82.88 | 6.12 | 0.0138* | |
|
20 vs. (10 + 0) × (1 + 2 + 3) vs.4 |
1 | 1213.4 | 89.60 | 0.0001* | |
| 20 vs. (10 + 0) × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 15.43 | 1.14 | 0.2864 | |
| 20 vs. (10 + 0) × 2 vs. 3 | 1 | 1522.94 | 112.45 | 0.0001* | |
| 10 vs. 0 × (1 + 2 + 3) vs. 4 | 1 | 55.59 | 4.40 | 0.0365 | |
| 10 vs. 0 × 1 vs. (2 + 3) | 1 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.9635 | |
| 10 vs. 0 × 2 vs. 3 | 1 | 513.52 | 37.92 | 0.0001* | |
| Category × Plot (Site (Latitude)) | 417 | 13.54 | |||
| Total | 575 |
Notes:
Main effect the number of species per stratum per 1/16 ha. Main was latitude,
with a split plot effect of site and a split-split plot effect of category.
Latitude and categories were fixed; site and plot replicates were random. Category
legend: (1) shrub layer; (2) subcanopy; (3) canopy; (4 )liana. An asterisk denotes
statistical significance at
= 0.05;
R2 = 0.90. The dependent variable was number of species/stratum.