Appendix F (Table F1). ANOVA to test the effects of treatment, site, and time on algal frond lengths (mm).
Source of variation |
df |
MS |
F |
P |
% |
|
Ulva sp. |
||||||
Site (S) |
1 |
9.263 |
112.76 |
< 0.001 *** |
6.7 |
|
Week (W) |
10 |
2.809 |
34.19 |
< 0.001 *** |
20.2 |
|
Treatment (T) |
4 |
8.795 |
107.07 |
< 0.001 *** |
25.3 |
|
S × W |
10 |
1.219 |
14.83 |
< 0.001 *** |
8.8 |
|
S × T |
4 |
0.588 |
7.16 |
< 0.001 *** |
1.7 |
|
W × T |
40 |
0.262 |
3.19 |
< 0.001 *** |
7.5 |
|
S × W × T |
40 |
0.138 |
1.65 |
0.007 * |
4 |
|
Error |
440 |
0.082 |
26 |
|||
Red algal turf |
||||||
Site (S) |
1 |
15.42 |
226.19 |
< 0.001 *** |
22.3 |
|
Week (W) |
10 |
0.908 |
13.32 |
< 0.001 *** |
13.2 |
|
Treatment (T) |
4 |
1.251 |
18.35 |
< 0.001 *** |
7.2 |
|
S × W |
10 |
0.273 |
4.01 |
< 0.001 *** |
4 |
|
S × T |
4 |
0.424 |
6.22 |
< 0.001 *** |
2.5 |
|
W × T |
40 |
0.091 |
1.33 |
0.909 NS |
5.3 |
|
S × W × T |
40 |
0.037 |
0.54 |
0.990 NS |
2.1 |
|
Error |
440 |
0.068 |
43.4 |
|||
Filamentous green algae |
||||||
Site (S) |
1 |
1.877 |
14.9 |
0.001 ** |
1.1 |
|
Week (W) |
10 |
5.553 |
44.1 |
< 0.001 *** |
33.9 |
|
Treatment (T) |
4 |
3.526 |
28.99 |
< 0.001 *** |
8.6 |
|
S × W |
10 |
0.713 |
5.66 |
< 0.001 *** |
4.4 |
|
S × T |
4 |
0.412 |
3.28 |
0.0116 * |
1 |
|
W × T |
40 |
0.439 |
3.49 |
< 0.001 *** |
10.7 |
|
S × W × T |
40 |
0.258 |
2.05 |
<0.001 *** |
6.3 |
|
Error |
440 |
0.126 |
33.9 |
|||
Articulated corallines |
||||||
Week (W) |
10 |
89.653 |
14.46 |
< 0.001 *** |
27.5 |
|
Treatment (T) |
4 |
118.69 |
19.14 |
< 0.001 *** |
14.6 |
|
W × T |
40 |
13.146 |
2.12 |
<0.001 *** |
16.1 |
|
Error |
220 |
6.2 |
41.8 |
|||
Upright Gymnogongrus sp. |
||||||
Site (S) |
1 |
1.055 |
14.39 |
<0.001 *** |
1.5 |
|
Week (W) |
10 |
1.938 |
26.42 |
< 0.001 *** |
27.5 |
|
Treatment (T) |
4 |
0.674 |
9.19 |
< 0.001 *** |
3.8 |
|
S × W |
10 |
0.805 |
10.98 |
< 0.001 *** |
11.4 |
|
S × T |
4 |
0.208 |
2.83 |
0.024 * |
1.2 |
|
W × T |
40 |
0.097 |
1.32 |
0.095 NS |
5.5 |
|
S × W × T |
40 |
0.06 |
0.823 |
0.772 NS |
3.4 |
|
Error |
440 |
0.073 |
45.7 |
|||
Notes: The data were transformed log10 (x + 1) for analysis. The percentage of variation in the model explained by each factor appears under ‘%’.
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005; *** P < 0.001, NS = P > 0.05.