Ecological Archives M080-004-A4

Louie H. Yang, Kyle Edwards, Jarrett E. Byrnes, Justin L. Bastow, Amber N. Wright, and Kenneth O. Spence. 2010. A meta-analysis of resource pulse–consumer interactions. Ecological Monographs 80:125-151.

Appendix D. Model selection tables for consumer response magnitude analyses.

TABLE D1. All thirty-two combinations of five explanatory categorical variables (R = response mechanism, S = ecosystem subtype, T = ecosystem type, P = consumer trophic position, and L = resource trophic level) and one grouping factor (s = system) explaining the regression between the resource pulse ratio and the consumer response ratio. Models within the 95% confidence set are shown in italics.

Model variables

Δ cAIC

cAIC weight

Δ AIC

AIC weight

s RPLTS

0.00000

0.17975

4.74557

0.02182

s RLTS

0.00003

0.17975

2.51132

0.06669

s RPLS

0.00084

0.17967

2.51132

0.06669

s RLS

0.00093

0.17967

0.30855

0.20064

s RPLT

2.32361

0.05625

7.40117

0.00578

s RL

3.62563

0.02933

4.02600

0.03127

s RPL

3.62692

0.02932

6.19797

0.01056

s RPS

4.14624

0.02261

2.17197

0.07903

s RS

4.14822

0.02259

0.00000

0.23411

s RTS

4.14858

0.02258

2.17197

0.07903

s RPTS

4.15033

0.02256

4.37475

0.02627

s RPT

4.60568

0.01797

5.63066

0.01402

s RT

4.60599

0.01797

3.45869

0.04153

s RLT

4.60916

0.01794

5.63067

0.01402

s RP

5.59204

0.01097

4.30123

0.02725

s R

5.60027

0.01093

2.15937

0.07953

s PLTS

17.81609

0.00002

17.79627

0.00003

s PLS

17.81662

0.00002

15.59349

0.00010

s PTS

18.41882

0.00002

15.72838

0.00009

s SP

18.42229

0.00002

13.55641

0.00027

s SL

19.03509

0.00001

14.10839

0.00020

s LTS

19.03608

0.00001

16.28036

0.00007

s TS

21.77992

0.00000

14.90757

0.00014

s S

21.78069

0.00000

12.76577

0.00040

s TL

22.14094

0.00000

18.45777

0.00002

s TP

22.14106

0.00000

18.45777

0.00002

s PLT

22.14126

0.00000

20.62973

0.00001

s

22.14130

0.00000

14.20370

0.00019

s PL

22.14133

0.00000

18.45777

0.00002

s L

22.14135

0.00000

16.31596

0.00007

s P

22.14141

0.00000

16.31596

0.00007

s T

22.14142

0.00000

16.31596

0.00007

 

TABLE D2. Categorical variable weights from model selection analyses using cAIC and AIC criteria, where R = response mechanism, L = resource trophic level, S = ecosystem subtype, P = consumer trophic position, and T = ecosystem type.

Variable

Variable weight from cAIC

Variable weight from AIC

R

0.99986

0.95015

L

0.85167

0.39586

S

0.80918

0.72619

T

0.51477

0.22108

P

0.50813

0.20333

 

TABLE D3. All ten valid combinations of four explanatory continuous variables (D = resource pulse duration, Ds = standardized pulse duration, G = consumer generation time, and B = consumer body mass) and one grouping factor (s = system) explaining the regression between the resource pulse ratio and the consumer response ratio. Models within the 95% confidence set are shown in italics.

Model variables

Δ cAIC

cAIC weight

Δ AIC

AIC weight

s Ds

0.0000

0.4554

0.0000

0.4723

s DsB

2.1561

0.1550

2.2395

0.1541

s GD

3.1262

0.0954

3.2096

0.0949

s D

3.7839

0.0687

3.7839

0.0712

s

3.9838

0.0621

4.2977

0.0551

s BD

4.2342

0.0548

4.3176

0.0545

s G

4.9049

0.0392

5.5213

0.0299

s B

5.4677

0.0296

5.4677

0.0307

s BGD

5.5024

0.0291

5.6739

0.0277

s BG

7.4963

0.0107

7.7967

0.0096

 

TABLE D4. Continuous variable weights from model selection analyses using cAIC and AIC criteria, where Ds = standardized pulse duration, G = consumer generation time, and B = consumer body mass, D = resource pulse duration.

Variable

Variable weight from cAIC

Variable weight from AIC

Ds

0.61037

0.62645

B

0.27918

0.27662

G

0.17441

0.16203

D

0.15257

0.24833


[Back to M080-004]